🚚 gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.7/5 from 893+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller 

Vintage durabrand tv

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.7 out of 5 (893 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$70​
$116.67
Sale
βœ“ no-cost delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Vintage durabrand CRT TV retro video game television DWTI 304 13 inch no remote tested and works

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
rapid fulfillment
↩️
handy Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage durabrand tv

Vintage durabrand CRT TV retro video game television DWTI 304 13 inch no remote tested and works​

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 893201

Category: Vintage > Electronics > Televisions

Original Price: $116.67 USD

Sale Price:$70 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand only-arrived

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ complimentary dispatch on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days​

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.7
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 1213 reviews
MK
Megan King βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 week ago Β· Fresno, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Fantastic product​
Honestly, the Vintage durabrand tv works well enough and it’s fine overall.
15 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Orlando, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
No complaints
exceptionally happy with this Vintage durabrand tv. Shipping was express.
21 people found this helpful
MK
Megan King βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Fresno, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Absolutely cherish it
The Vintage durabrand tv feels normal, not economical, not fancy.
31 people found this helpful
JM
Jessica Moore βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Aurora, CO

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly advocate!
The Vintage durabrand tv works the way I expected it to.
5 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· San Jose, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Totally worth it
The Vintage durabrand tv works fine and arrived as expected.
7 people found this helpful