🚚 gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.5/5 from 287+ reviews
Kids βœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Old Navy 4T shorts romper

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.5 out of 5 (287 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$10.45​
$17.42
Sale
βœ“ no-cost delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Adorable romper- my daughter wore once and outgrew.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
rapid fulfillment

↩️
handy Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Old Navy 4T shorts romper

Adorable romper- my daughter wore once and outgrew.

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Kids products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 734843

Category: Kids > Girls One-pieces > Girls 2T-5T

Original Price: $17.42 USD

Sale Price:$10.45 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand only-arrived

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ complimentary dispatch on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.5
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 5991 reviews
MK
Megan King βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· St. Louis, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Really fabulous
In daily use, the Old Navy 4T shorts romper performs as expected and I don’t regret it. Packaging was straightforward.
15 people found this helpful
RS
Rachel Scott βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Fresno, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exactly what I needed
So far, the Old Navy 4T shorts romper performs as expected so no complaints.
10 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Pittsburgh, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
exceptionally pleased
Personally, the Old Navy 4T shorts romper feels solid which is good enough. Packaging was straightforward.​
38 people found this helpful
JW
Jennifer Wilson βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Colorado Springs, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superb find!
From my experience, it is effortless to use which is good enough.
35 people found this helpful
JM
Jessica Moore βœ“ Verified Purchase 
4 months ago Β· Phoenix, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
premier purchase ever
Feels fine so far.
43 people found this helpful